Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus

Belarus: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 12.4% in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
12.4%
Change on year
up 7.4%
World rank
8th
of 35 countries
All-time high
17.2%
in 2012
All-time low
11.1%
in 2010
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 14.72009: 11.32010: 11.12012: 17.22013: 16.42014: 11.92015: 11.82016: 11.82017: 13.92018: 11.62019: 12.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus stood at 12.4%.

That represents a change of up 7.4% on the previous year and up 10.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus peaked at 17.2% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 11.1%, in 2010.

Belarus ranks 8th of 35 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 14.7%
2009 11.3% -23.6%
2010 11.1% -1.7%
2012 17.2% +55.2%
2013 16.4% -4.5%
2014 11.9% -27.3%
2015 11.8% -1.4%
2016 11.8% +0.6%
2017 13.9% +17.5%
2018 11.6% -16.7%
2019 12.4% +7.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 13.0% 11.3% 14.7% 2
2010s 13.1% 11.1% 17.2% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 5 Romania 16.9% compare
  2. 6 Thailand 14.1% compare
  3. 7 Paraguay 13.7% compare
  4. 9 Brazil 11.7% compare
  5. 10 Turkey 11.3% compare
  6. 11 Kazakhstan 10.9% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus was 12.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 17.2% in 2012.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 11.1% in 2010.
How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Belarus ranks 8th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/belarus/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population