Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus
Belarus: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 9.1% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus stood at 9.1%.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 15.3% on the previous year and up 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus peaked at 16.7% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 8.5%, in 2010.
That places Belarus 20th out of 36 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 9.4% | — |
| 2009 | 8.5% | -8.7% |
| 2010 | 8.5% | -0.6% |
| 2012 | 9.9% | +16.3% |
| 2013 | 10.3% | +4.3% |
| 2014 | 8.9% | -13.5% |
| 2015 | 8.7% | -1.9% |
| 2016 | 16.7% | +90.7% |
| 2017 | 9.1% | -45.4% |
| 2018 | 10.8% | +18.1% |
| 2019 | 9.1% | -15.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.0% | 8.5% | 9.4% | 2 |
| 2010s | 10.2% | 8.5% | 16.7% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 17 Kosovo 9.3% compare
- 17 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 9.3% compare
- 19 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 9.1% compare
- 21 El Salvador 8.9% compare
- 22 Brazil 8.8% compare
- 23 South Africa 8.7% compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus?
- Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus was 9.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 16.7% in 2016.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.5% in 2010.
- How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 20th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population