Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) was 0.1778 in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
0.1778
Change on year
up 19.3%
World rank
16th
of 34 countries
All-time high
0.1778
in 2020
All-time low
0.1286
in 2010
Years of data
6
2006–2020

Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

00.050.10.150.22006201320202006: 0.1572010: 0.1292012: 0.1492014: 0.1582018: 0.1492020: 0.178

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam stood at 0.1778. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 19.3% on the previous year and up 38.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam peaked at 0.1778 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.1286, in 2010.

Viet Nam ranks 16th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 0.1566
2010 0.1286 -17.9%
2012 0.1494 +16.2%
2014 0.158 +5.8%
2018 0.1491 -5.6%
2020 0.1778 +19.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.1566 0.1566 0.1566 1
2010s 0.1463 0.1286 0.158 4
2020s 0.1778 0.1778 0.1778 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 13 Thailand 0.202 compare
  2. 14 Türkiye 0.196 compare
  3. 15 Chile 0.1907 compare
  4. 17 Uruguay 0.1439 compare
  5. 18 Pakistan 0.1383 compare
  6. 19 Sri Lanka 0.1284 compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam?
Benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam was 0.1778 in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 0.1778 in 2020.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1286 in 2010.
How does Viet Nam rank for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)?
Viet Nam ranks 16th out of 34 countries with data for 2020.
Is benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is up 38.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-contributory-pensions-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-contributory-pensions-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/viet-nam/">Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)