Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Serbia
Serbia: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.3316 poorest in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
In 2022, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Serbia stood at 0.3316 poorest. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 36.7% on the previous year and up 14.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Serbia peaked at 0.3316 poorest in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.2355 poorest, in 2007.
Serbia ranks 3rd of 36 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Serbia, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0.2355 poorest | — |
| 2010 | 0.3027 poorest | +28.5% |
| 2013 | 0.2891 poorest | -4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.2403 poorest | -16.9% |
| 2018 | 0.2877 poorest | +19.7% |
| 2019 | 0.3032 poorest | +5.4% |
| 2021 | 0.2426 poorest | -20.0% |
| 2022 | 0.3316 poorest | +36.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2355 poorest | 0.2355 poorest | 0.2355 poorest | 1 |
| 2010s | 0.2846 poorest | 0.2403 poorest | 0.3032 poorest | 5 |
| 2020s | 0.2871 poorest | 0.2426 poorest | 0.3316 poorest | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 1 Republic of Moldova 0.3989 poorest compare
- 2 Thailand 0.3392 poorest compare
- 4 Romania 0.3172 poorest compare
- 5 Armenia 0.3053 poorest compare
- 6 Kyrgyzstan 0.2979 poorest compare
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Serbia?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Serbia was 0.3316 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3316 poorest in 2022.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2355 poorest in 2007.
- How does Serbia rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile?
- Serbia ranks 3rd out of 36 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)