Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Poland, Republic of

Poland, Republic of: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.0055 poorest in 2019. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2019)
0.0055 poorest
Change on year
down 97.1%
World rank
35th
of 35 countries
All-time high
0.2104 poorest
in 2012
All-time low
0.0055 poorest
in 2019
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Poland, Republic of, 2005–2019

00.050.10.150.22005201220192005: 0.199 poorest2006: 0.204 poorest2007: 0.185 poorest2008: 0.186 poorest2009: 0.208 poorest2010: 0.189 poorest2011: 0.204 poorest2012: 0.21 poorest2015: 0.189 poorest2016: 0.187 poorest2017: 0.191 poorest2019: 0.006 poorest

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.

Analysis

In 2019, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Poland, Republic of stood at 0.0055 poorest. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 97.1% on the previous year and down 97.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Poland, Republic of peaked at 0.2104 poorest in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.0055 poorest, in 2019.

That places Poland, Republic of 35th out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.1965 poorest 0.1852 poorest 0.2077 poorest 5
2010s 0.168 poorest 0.0055 poorest 0.2104 poorest 7

Countries ranked near Poland, Republic of

  1. 32 Honduras 0.1253 poorest compare
  2. 33 Burkina Faso 0.1192 poorest compare
  3. 34 Malawi 0.1134 poorest compare

See the full ranking of 35 places β†’

More reference data data for Poland, Republic of

All data for Poland, Republic of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Poland, Republic of?
Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Poland, Republic of was 0.0055 poorest in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Poland, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 0.2104 poorest in 2012.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Poland, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0055 poorest in 2019.
How does Poland, Republic of rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile?
Poland, Republic of ranks 35th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Poland, Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is down 97.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Poland, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Poland, Republic of. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/poland/">Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Poland, Republic of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest)
Unit
poorest
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 346 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)