Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Belarus
Belarus: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.2394 poorest in 2019. β² Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile in Belarus, 2008β2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Belarus is 0.2394 poorest, measured in 2019.
The figure is up 6.5% on the previous year and up 8.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Belarus peaked at 0.2444 poorest in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.1801 poorest, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 12th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2006 poorest | 0.1801 poorest | 0.2211 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.2194 poorest | 0.1877 poorest | 0.2444 poorest | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 9 Dominican Republic 0.2798 poorest compare
- 10 South Africa 0.2753 poorest compare
- 11 Mexico 0.2458 poorest compare
- 13 Mongolia 0.2376 poorest compare
- 14 Georgia 0.2359 poorest compare
- 15 Costa Rica 0.2251 poorest compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Belarus?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile in Belarus was 0.2394 poorest in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2444 poorest in 2013.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1801 poorest in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile?
- Belarus ranks 12th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)