Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) was 0.3049 in 2017. ▲ Rising

Latest (2017)
0.3049
World rank
6th
of 36 countries
All-time high
0.3331
in 2013
All-time low
0.2705
in 2006
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

00.10.20.32006201120172006: 0.272011: 0.2922012: 0.2962013: 0.3332017: 0.305

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2017, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) stood at 0.3049.

That represents a change of up 12.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 0.3331 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.2705, in 2006.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 6th of 36 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 0.2705
2011 0.2917 +7.8%
2012 0.2958 +1.4%
2013 0.3331 +12.6%
2017 0.3049 -8.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2705 0.2705 0.2705 1
2010s 0.3064 0.2917 0.3331 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 3 Romania 0.3468 compare
  2. 4 Kyrgyzstan 0.3204 compare
  3. 5 Thailand 0.3196 compare
  4. 6 Kosovo 0.3049 compare
  5. 8 South Africa 0.289 compare
  6. 9 Armenia 0.2874 compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 0.3049 in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 0.3331 in 2013.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 0.2705 in 2006.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest)?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2017.
Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)