Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador

Ecuador: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) was 0.2226 in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
0.2226
Change on year
up 19.0%
World rank
21st
of 36 countries
All-time high
0.2564
in 2016
All-time low
0.1555
in 2020
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador, 2008–2022

00.10.20.32008201520222008: 0.1672010: 0.1992011: 0.2092012: 0.2522014: 0.1732015: 0.1842016: 0.2562017: 0.2052018: 0.1762019: 0.1852020: 0.1552021: 0.1872022: 0.223

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Ecuador recorded 0.2226 for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in 2022.

The figure is up 19.0% on the previous year and down 11.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador peaked at 0.2564 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.1555, in 2020.

Ecuador ranks 21st of 36 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 0.1666
2010 0.1994 +19.7%
2011 0.2087 +4.7%
2012 0.2519 +20.7%
2014 0.1733 -31.2%
2015 0.1836 +6.0%
2016 0.2564 +39.6%
2017 0.205 -20.0%
2018 0.1761 -14.1%
2019 0.1855 +5.3%
2020 0.1555 -16.2%
2021 0.187 +20.3%
2022 0.2226 +19.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.1666 0.1666 0.1666 1
2010s 0.2044 0.1733 0.2564 9
2020s 0.1883 0.1555 0.2226 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 18 Costa Rica 0.2255 compare
  2. 19 Uruguay 0.2239 compare
  3. 20 Colombia 0.2227 compare
  4. 22 Paraguay 0.219 compare
  5. 23 Argentina 0.218 compare
  6. 24 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.2159 compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador?
Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador was 0.2226 in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 0.2564 in 2016.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1555 in 2020.
How does Ecuador rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest)?
Ecuador ranks 21st out of 36 countries with data for 2022.
Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 11.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/ecuador/">Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)