Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland

Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) was 0.0072 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
0.0072
Change on year
down 95.9%
World rank
35th
of 35 countries
All-time high
0.2026
in 2006
All-time low
0.0072
in 2019
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland, 2005–2019

00.050.10.150.22005201220192005: 0.192006: 0.2032007: 0.1812008: 0.1742009: 0.1972010: 0.192011: 0.1912012: 0.1922015: 0.1782016: 0.1872017: 0.1772019: 0.007

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland stood at 0.0072. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is down 95.9% on the previous year and down 96.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland peaked at 0.2026 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0072, in 2019.

That places Poland 35th out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 0.1904
2006 0.2026 +6.4%
2007 0.1806 -10.9%
2008 0.1743 -3.5%
2009 0.197 +13.0%
2010 0.1902 -3.4%
2011 0.1907 +0.2%
2012 0.1922 +0.8%
2015 0.178 -7.4%
2016 0.1873 +5.2%
2017 0.1766 -5.7%
2019 0.0072 -95.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.189 0.1743 0.2026 5
2010s 0.1603 0.0072 0.1922 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 32 El Salvador 0.1228 compare
  2. 33 Honduras 0.105 compare
  3. 34 Panama 0.082 compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland?
Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland was 0.0072 in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 0.2026 in 2006.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0072 in 2019.
How does Poland rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest)?
Poland ranks 35th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 96.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/poland/">Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)