Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) was 0.2949 in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
0.2949
World rank
8th
of 35 countries
All-time high
0.3662
in 2006
All-time low
0.2884
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

00.10.20.30.42006201120172006: 0.3662011: 0.3372012: 0.2882013: 0.3022017: 0.295

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2017, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) stood at 0.2949.

The figure is down 19.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 0.3662 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.2884, in 2012.

That places Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 8th out of 35 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 0.3662
2011 0.3368 -8.0%
2012 0.2884 -14.4%
2013 0.3017 +4.6%
2017 0.2949 -2.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.3662 0.3662 0.3662 1
2010s 0.3054 0.2884 0.3368 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 5 Serbia 0.3172 compare
  2. 6 Pakistan 0.3156 compare
  3. 7 Costa Rica 0.295 compare
  4. 8 Kosovo 0.2949 compare
  5. 10 Kyrgyzstan 0.2908 compare
  6. 11 Chile 0.2858 compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 0.2949 in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 0.3662 in 2006.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 0.2884 in 2012.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest)?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 8th out of 35 countries with data for 2017.
Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is down 19.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)