Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Kelheim
Kelheim: Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection was 0.0002 Number in 2100. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2100)
0.0002 Number
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
961st
of 1209 regions
All-time high
0.0017 Number
in 2019
All-time low
0.0002 Number
in 2099
Years of data
82
2019–2100
Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Kelheim, 2019–2100
Source: Eurostat. Measured in Number.
Analysis
Kelheim recorded 0.0002 Number for assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in 2100. That is the lowest value across all 82 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 24.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Kelheim peaked at 0.0017 Number in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.0002 Number, in 2099.
That places Kelheim 961st out of 1209 regions with data for 2100, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Kelheim, year by year
| Year | Number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.0017 Number | — |
| 2020 | 0.0017 Number | -0.6% |
| 2021 | 0.0016 Number | -2.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0016 Number | -2.4% |
| 2023 | 0.0016 Number | -2.5% |
| 2024 | 0.0015 Number | -3.2% |
| 2025 | 0.0015 Number | -2.0% |
| 2026 | 0.0014 Number | -2.7% |
| 2027 | 0.0014 Number | -2.8% |
| 2028 | 0.0014 Number | -2.9% |
| 2029 | 0.0013 Number | -2.2% |
| 2030 | 0.0013 Number | -3.0% |
| 2031 | 0.0013 Number | -2.3% |
| 2032 | 0.0012 Number | -3.2% |
| 2033 | 0.0012 Number | -2.5% |
| 2034 | 0.0012 Number | -2.5% |
| 2035 | 0.0011 Number | -2.6% |
| 2036 | 0.0011 Number | -2.7% |
| 2037 | 0.0011 Number | -2.7% |
| 2038 | 0.001 Number | -2.8% |
| 2039 | 0.001 Number | -2.9% |
| 2040 | 0.001 Number | -2.0% |
| 2041 | 0.001 Number | -3.0% |
| 2042 | 0.0009 Number | -3.1% |
| 2043 | 0.0009 Number | -2.2% |
| 2044 | 0.0009 Number | -3.3% |
| 2045 | 0.0009 Number | -2.3% |
| 2046 | 0.0008 Number | -2.3% |
| 2047 | 0.0008 Number | -3.6% |
| 2048 | 0.0008 Number | -2.5% |
| 2049 | 0.0008 Number | -2.5% |
| 2050 | 0.0008 Number | -2.6% |
| 2051 | 0.0007 Number | -2.7% |
| 2052 | 0.0007 Number | -2.7% |
| 2053 | 0.0007 Number | -2.8% |
| 2054 | 0.0007 Number | -2.9% |
| 2055 | 0.0006 Number | -3.0% |
| 2056 | 0.0006 Number | -1.5% |
| 2057 | 0.0006 Number | -3.1% |
| 2058 | 0.0006 Number | -3.2% |
| 2059 | 0.0006 Number | -1.7% |
| 2060 | 0.0006 Number | -3.4% |
| 2061 | 0.0006 Number | -3.5% |
| 2062 | 0.0005 Number | -1.8% |
| 2063 | 0.0005 Number | -1.9% |
| 2064 | 0.0005 Number | -3.8% |
| 2065 | 0.0005 Number | -2.0% |
| 2066 | 0.0005 Number | -4.0% |
| 2067 | 0.0005 Number | -2.1% |
| 2068 | 0.0005 Number | -2.1% |
| 2069 | 0.0004 Number | -4.3% |
| 2070 | 0.0004 Number | -2.3% |
| 2071 | 0.0004 Number | -2.3% |
| 2072 | 0.0004 Number | -2.4% |
| 2073 | 0.0004 Number | -2.4% |
| 2074 | 0.0004 Number | -2.5% |
| 2075 | 0.0004 Number | -2.6% |
| 2076 | 0.0004 Number | -2.6% |
| 2077 | 0.0004 Number | -2.7% |
| 2078 | 0.0003 Number | -2.8% |
| 2079 | 0.0003 Number | -2.9% |
| 2080 | 0.0003 Number | -2.9% |
| 2081 | 0.0003 Number | -3.0% |
| 2082 | 0.0003 Number | -3.1% |
| 2083 | 0.0003 Number | -3.2% |
| 2084 | 0.0003 Number | -3.3% |
| 2085 | 0.0003 Number | -3.4% |
| 2086 | 0.0003 Number | +0.0% |
| 2087 | 0.0003 Number | -3.6% |
| 2088 | 0.0003 Number | -3.7% |
| 2089 | 0.0003 Number | -3.8% |
| 2090 | 0.0003 Number | +0.0% |
| 2091 | 0.0002 Number | -4.0% |
| 2092 | 0.0002 Number | -4.2% |
| 2093 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2094 | 0.0002 Number | -4.3% |
| 2095 | 0.0002 Number | -4.5% |
| 2096 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2097 | 0.0002 Number | -4.8% |
| 2098 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2099 | 0.0002 Number | -5.0% |
| 2100 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0017 Number | 0.0017 Number | 0.0017 Number | 1 |
| 2020s | 0.0015 Number | 0.0013 Number | 0.0017 Number | 10 |
| 2030s | 0.0011 Number | 0.001 Number | 0.0013 Number | 10 |
| 2040s | 0.0009 Number | 0.0008 Number | 0.001 Number | 10 |
| 2050s | 0.0007 Number | 0.0006 Number | 0.0008 Number | 10 |
| 2060s | 0.0005 Number | 0.0004 Number | 0.0006 Number | 10 |
| 2070s | 0.0004 Number | 0.0003 Number | 0.0004 Number | 10 |
| 2080s | 0.0003 Number | 0.0003 Number | 0.0003 Number | 10 |
| 2090s | 0.0002 Number | 0.0002 Number | 0.0003 Number | 10 |
| 2100s | 0.0002 Number | 0.0002 Number | 0.0002 Number | 1 |
More reference data data for Kelheim
- Projected deaths by age, sex, type of projection and NUTS 3 region 1,437 Person (2100)
- Cooling and heating degree days by NUTS 2 regions - annual data 2,992 Number (2025)
- Cooling and heating degree days by NUTS 2 regions - monthly data 512.27 Number (2025)
- Deaths (total) by NUTS 3 region 1,313 Number (2024)
- Area by NUTS 3 region 1,065 Square kilometre (2026)
- National road freight transport by region of unloading (NUTS 3) and 4,921 Thousand tonnes (2025)
- National road freight transport by region of loading (NUTS 3) and 5,320 Thousand tonnes (2025)
- Police-recorded offences by NUTS 3 region 0 Number (2024)
- Nights spent at tourist accommodation establishments by NUTS 3 region 605,346 Number (2024)
- Deaths by age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 1,313 Number (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Kelheim?
- Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Kelheim was 0.0002 Number in 2100, according to Eurostat.
- What is the highest assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection recorded in Kelheim?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0017 Number in 2019.
- What is the lowest assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection recorded in Kelheim?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0002 Number in 2099.
- How does Kelheim rank for assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection?
- Kelheim ranks 961st out of 1209 regions with data for 2100.
- Is assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection rising or falling in Kelheim?
- Over the last ten years it is down 24.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kelheim data come from?
- The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection and NUTS 3 region. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 82 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).