Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Buskerud (statistical region 2016)
Buskerud (statistical region 2016): Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection was 0.0002 Number in 2100. ◆ Volatile
Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Buskerud (statistical region 2016), 2019–2100
Source: Eurostat. Measured in Number.
Analysis
In 2100, assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Buskerud (statistical region 2016) stood at 0.0002 Number. That is the lowest value across all 82 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 22.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Buskerud (statistical region 2016) peaked at 0.0013 Number in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.0002 Number, in 2098.
That places Buskerud (statistical region 2016) 1119th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Buskerud (statistical region 2016), year by year
| Year | Number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.0013 Number | — |
| 2020 | 0.0013 Number | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0013 Number | -3.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0012 Number | -2.4% |
| 2023 | 0.0012 Number | -2.4% |
| 2024 | 0.0012 Number | -2.5% |
| 2025 | 0.0011 Number | -2.5% |
| 2026 | 0.0011 Number | -2.6% |
| 2027 | 0.0011 Number | -2.7% |
| 2028 | 0.0011 Number | -1.8% |
| 2029 | 0.001 Number | -2.8% |
| 2030 | 0.001 Number | -2.9% |
| 2031 | 0.001 Number | -2.0% |
| 2032 | 0.001 Number | -3.0% |
| 2033 | 0.0009 Number | -2.1% |
| 2034 | 0.0009 Number | -2.1% |
| 2035 | 0.0009 Number | -3.3% |
| 2036 | 0.0009 Number | -2.2% |
| 2037 | 0.0008 Number | -2.3% |
| 2038 | 0.0008 Number | -2.4% |
| 2039 | 0.0008 Number | -2.4% |
| 2040 | 0.0008 Number | -2.5% |
| 2041 | 0.0008 Number | -2.5% |
| 2042 | 0.0008 Number | -2.6% |
| 2043 | 0.0007 Number | -2.7% |
| 2044 | 0.0007 Number | -2.7% |
| 2045 | 0.0007 Number | -2.8% |
| 2046 | 0.0007 Number | -2.9% |
| 2047 | 0.0007 Number | -1.5% |
| 2048 | 0.0006 Number | -3.0% |
| 2049 | 0.0006 Number | -3.1% |
| 2050 | 0.0006 Number | -1.6% |
| 2051 | 0.0006 Number | -3.3% |
| 2052 | 0.0006 Number | -1.7% |
| 2053 | 0.0006 Number | -3.4% |
| 2054 | 0.0006 Number | -1.8% |
| 2055 | 0.0005 Number | -3.6% |
| 2056 | 0.0005 Number | -1.9% |
| 2057 | 0.0005 Number | -1.9% |
| 2058 | 0.0005 Number | -3.9% |
| 2059 | 0.0005 Number | -2.0% |
| 2060 | 0.0005 Number | -2.1% |
| 2061 | 0.0005 Number | -2.1% |
| 2062 | 0.0004 Number | -2.2% |
| 2063 | 0.0004 Number | -4.4% |
| 2064 | 0.0004 Number | -2.3% |
| 2065 | 0.0004 Number | -2.4% |
| 2066 | 0.0004 Number | -2.4% |
| 2067 | 0.0004 Number | -2.5% |
| 2068 | 0.0004 Number | -2.6% |
| 2069 | 0.0004 Number | -2.6% |
| 2070 | 0.0004 Number | -2.7% |
| 2071 | 0.0003 Number | -2.8% |
| 2072 | 0.0003 Number | -2.9% |
| 2073 | 0.0003 Number | +0.0% |
| 2074 | 0.0003 Number | -2.9% |
| 2075 | 0.0003 Number | -3.0% |
| 2076 | 0.0003 Number | -3.1% |
| 2077 | 0.0003 Number | -3.2% |
| 2078 | 0.0003 Number | -3.3% |
| 2079 | 0.0003 Number | +0.0% |
| 2080 | 0.0003 Number | -3.4% |
| 2081 | 0.0003 Number | -3.6% |
| 2082 | 0.0003 Number | +0.0% |
| 2083 | 0.0003 Number | -3.7% |
| 2084 | 0.0003 Number | -3.8% |
| 2085 | 0.0003 Number | +0.0% |
| 2086 | 0.0002 Number | -4.0% |
| 2087 | 0.0002 Number | -4.2% |
| 2088 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2089 | 0.0002 Number | -4.3% |
| 2090 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2091 | 0.0002 Number | -4.5% |
| 2092 | 0.0002 Number | -4.8% |
| 2093 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2094 | 0.0002 Number | -5.0% |
| 2095 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2096 | 0.0002 Number | -5.3% |
| 2097 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2098 | 0.0002 Number | -5.6% |
| 2099 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
| 2100 | 0.0002 Number | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0013 Number | 0.0013 Number | 0.0013 Number | 1 |
| 2020s | 0.0012 Number | 0.001 Number | 0.0013 Number | 10 |
| 2030s | 0.0009 Number | 0.0008 Number | 0.001 Number | 10 |
| 2040s | 0.0007 Number | 0.0006 Number | 0.0008 Number | 10 |
| 2050s | 0.0005 Number | 0.0005 Number | 0.0006 Number | 10 |
| 2060s | 0.0004 Number | 0.0004 Number | 0.0005 Number | 10 |
| 2070s | 0.0003 Number | 0.0003 Number | 0.0004 Number | 10 |
| 2080s | 0.0003 Number | 0.0002 Number | 0.0003 Number | 10 |
| 2090s | 0.0002 Number | 0.0002 Number | 0.0002 Number | 10 |
| 2100s | 0.0002 Number | 0.0002 Number | 0.0002 Number | 1 |
More reference data data for Buskerud (statistical region 2016)
- Projected deaths by age, sex, type of projection and NUTS 3 region 3,986 Person (2100)
- Deaths (total) by NUTS 3 region 2,313 Number (2019)
- Deaths by week and NUTS 3 region 31 Number (2021)
- Road accidents by NUTS 3 region 183 Number (2019)
- Area by NUTS 3 region 14,911 Square kilometre (2020)
- National road freight transport by region of unloading (NUTS 3) and 21,134 Thousand tonnes (2020)
- National road freight transport by region of loading (NUTS 3) and 20,989 Thousand tonnes (2020)
- Police-recorded offences by NUTS 3 region 3 Number (2019)
- Deaths by age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 2,313 Number (2019)
- Area by NUTS 3 region 14,911 Square kilometre (2015)
Frequently asked questions
- What is assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Buskerud (statistical region 2016)?
- Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection in Buskerud (statistical region 2016) was 0.0002 Number in 2100, according to Eurostat.
- What is the highest assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection recorded in Buskerud (statistical region 2016)?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0013 Number in 2019.
- What is the lowest assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection recorded in Buskerud (statistical region 2016)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0002 Number in 2098.
- How does Buskerud (statistical region 2016) rank for assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection?
- Buskerud (statistical region 2016) ranks 1119th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100.
- Is assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection rising or falling in Buskerud (statistical region 2016)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Buskerud (statistical region 2016) data come from?
- The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Assumptions for probability of dying by age, sex, type of projection and NUTS 3 region. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 82 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).