Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP in Portugal
Portugal: Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP in Portugal, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp in Portugal is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 10.4% on the previous year and down 7.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp in Portugal peaked at 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
Portugal ranks 122nd of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP in Portugal, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1963 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1964 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1965 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
| 1974 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 1975 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 1976 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1977 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1978 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1979 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1980 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 1981 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 1982 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 1983 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +12.1% |
| 1984 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
| 1985 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1986 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -30.0% |
| 1987 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.6% |
| 1988 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 1989 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1990 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -23.0% |
| 1991 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1992 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 1993 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +30.0% |
| 1994 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 1995 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 1996 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1997 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.0% |
| 1998 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +15.6% |
| 1999 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +15.0% |
| 2000 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.1% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +7.8% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +13.8% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +15.6% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
Portugal compared with similar countries
- Portugal's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 2.9× the median. (70 countries reporting)
- Portugal's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 1.1× the median. (53 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
More reference data data for Portugal
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5144 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4372 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2572 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp in Portugal?
- Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp in Portugal was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Portugal rank for area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp?
- Portugal ranks 122nd out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
- Is area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Area of permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Area of permanent meadows and pastures ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Area of permanent meadows and pastures Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Area of permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.