Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -urban was 11.2% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 11.2% for adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -urban in 2019.
The figure is up 4.8% on the previous year and up 0.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -urban in Belarus peaked at 14.4% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 8.1%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 34th of 36 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 8.1% | — |
| 2009 | 11.1% | +37.6% |
| 2010 | 10.4% | -6.5% |
| 2012 | 11.7% | +12.5% |
| 2013 | 12.8% | +9.7% |
| 2014 | 14.4% | +12.2% |
| 2015 | 12.7% | -11.6% |
| 2016 | 14.4% | +13.0% |
| 2017 | 11.4% | -20.9% |
| 2018 | 10.7% | -5.9% |
| 2019 | 11.2% | +4.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.6% | 8.1% | 11.1% | 2 |
| 2010s | 12.2% | 10.4% | 14.4% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 31 Côte d'Ivoire 14.6% compare
- 32 El Salvador 13.9% compare
- 33 Ecuador 13.0% compare
- 35 Panama 10.3% compare
- 36 Burkina Faso 8.0% compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -urban in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -urban in Belarus was 11.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -urban recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 14.4% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -urban recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.1% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- Belarus ranks 34th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -urban rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group