Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural was 10.5% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus stood at 10.5%.
The figure is up 5.5% on the previous year and down 1.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus peaked at 12.4% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 7.5%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 32nd of 35 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 7.5% | — |
| 2009 | 10.7% | +41.6% |
| 2010 | 8.9% | -16.5% |
| 2012 | 10.8% | +21.7% |
| 2013 | 11.6% | +7.6% |
| 2014 | 12.4% | +6.4% |
| 2015 | 10.9% | -12.1% |
| 2016 | 12.3% | +12.7% |
| 2017 | 10.3% | -16.3% |
| 2018 | 10.0% | -2.8% |
| 2019 | 10.5% | +5.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.1% | 7.5% | 10.7% | 2 |
| 2010s | 10.9% | 8.9% | 12.4% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus was 10.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 12.4% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.5% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Belarus ranks 32nd out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group