Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Ukraine

Ukraine: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory was 42.0% in 2020. ▼ Falling

Latest (2020)
42.0%
Change on year
up 32.5%
World rank
12th
of 34 countries
All-time high
49.4%
in 2013
All-time low
21.7%
in 2016
Years of data
10
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Ukraine, 2006–2020

010203040502006201320202006: 33.62011: 44.32012: 46.72013: 49.42015: 37.32016: 21.72017: 32.12018: 36.92019: 31.72020: 42

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Ukraine recorded 42.0% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in 2020.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 32.5% on the previous year and down 5.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Ukraine peaked at 49.4% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 21.7%, in 2016.

Ukraine ranks 12th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 10 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Ukraine, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Ukraine, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 33.6%
2011 44.3% +31.6%
2012 46.7% +5.5%
2013 49.4% +5.8%
2015 37.3% -24.6%
2016 21.7% -41.8%
2017 32.1% +47.9%
2018 36.9% +15.0%
2019 31.7% -14.1%
2020 42.0% +32.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 33.6% 33.6% 33.6% 1
2010s 37.5% 21.7% 49.4% 8
2020s 42.0% 42.0% 42.0% 1

Countries ranked near Ukraine

  1. 9 South Africa 46.9% compare
  2. 10 Kyrgyzstan 43.6% compare
  3. 11 Costa Rica 42.6% compare
  4. 13 Belarus 41.1% compare
  5. 14 Türkiye 40.8% compare
  6. 15 Mexico 40.0% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Ukraine

All data for Ukraine →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Ukraine?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Ukraine was 42.0% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Ukraine?
The highest recorded value was 49.4% in 2013.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Ukraine?
The lowest recorded value was 21.7% in 2016.
How does Ukraine rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
Ukraine ranks 12th out of 34 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Ukraine?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Ukraine data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Ukraine. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/ukraine/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Ukraine</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group