Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory was 52.6% in 2021. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2021)
52.6%
Change on year
down 2.1%
World rank
6th
of 34 countries
All-time high
53.8%
in 2020
All-time low
5.2%
in 2014
Years of data
9
2007–2021

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021

10203040502007201420212007: 7.52010: 21.72014: 5.22015: 50.52017: 50.52018: 50.32019: 52.72020: 53.82021: 52.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2021, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Kazakhstan stood at 52.6%.

The figure is down 2.1% on the previous year and up 142.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Kazakhstan peaked at 53.8% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 5.2%, in 2014.

Kazakhstan ranks 6th of 34 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kazakhstan, 2007 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2007 7.5%
2010 21.7% +187.4%
2014 5.2% -75.9%
2015 50.5% +868.2%
2017 50.5% +0.0%
2018 50.3% -0.4%
2019 52.7% +4.8%
2020 53.8% +1.9%
2021 52.6% -2.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 1
2010s 38.5% 5.2% 52.7% 6
2020s 53.2% 52.6% 53.8% 2

Countries ranked near Kazakhstan

  1. 3 Poland 76.5% compare
  2. 4 Uruguay 55.4% compare
  3. 5 Serbia 54.1% compare
  4. 7 Republic of Moldova 49.9% compare
  5. 8 Mongolia 47.5% compare
  6. 9 South Africa 46.9% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Kazakhstan

All data for Kazakhstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Kazakhstan?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Kazakhstan was 52.6% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Kazakhstan?
The highest recorded value was 53.8% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Kazakhstan?
The lowest recorded value was 5.2% in 2014.
How does Kazakhstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
Kazakhstan ranks 6th out of 34 countries with data for 2021.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 142.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/kazakhstan/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group