Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Serbia

Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory was 30.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
30.0%
Change on year
up 13.7%
World rank
20th
of 34 countries
All-time high
38.8%
in 2013
All-time low
26.4%
in 2021
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Serbia, 2007–2022

0102030402007201420222007: 28.7 preT2010: 33.5 preT2013: 38.8 preT2015: 34.5 preT2018: 29.9 preT2019: 29.8 preT2021: 26.4 preT2022: 30 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Serbia stood at 30.0%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 13.7% on the previous year and down 22.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Serbia peaked at 38.8% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 26.4%, in 2021.

Serbia ranks 20th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT) in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year preT Change
2007 28.7%
2010 33.5% +16.8%
2013 38.8% +15.8%
2015 34.5% -11.0%
2018 29.9% -13.3%
2019 29.8% -0.2%
2021 26.4% -11.6%
2022 30.0% +13.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 28.7% 28.7% 28.7% 1
2010s 33.3% 29.8% 38.8% 5
2020s 28.2% 26.4% 30.0% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 17 Dominican Republic 31.3% compare
  2. 18 Paraguay 30.3% compare
  3. 19 Belarus 30.2% compare
  4. 21 Republic of Moldova 28.7% compare
  5. 22 Panama 28.3% compare
  6. 23 Kyrgyzstan 27.4% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Serbia?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Serbia was 30.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 38.8% in 2013.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 26.4% in 2021.
How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
Serbia ranks 20th out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is down 22.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-pret/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-pret/serbia/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group