Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private was 10.4% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
10.4%
Change on year
down 4.3%
World rank
31st
of 35 countries
All-time high
13.9%
in 2016
All-time low
6.7%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 6.72009: 10.22010: 8.92012: 9.22013: 9.72014: 12.22015: 11.22016: 13.92017: 11.42018: 10.92019: 10.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Belarus stood at 10.4%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.3% on the previous year and up 2.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Belarus peaked at 13.9% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 6.7%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 31st of 35 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 6.7%
2009 10.2% +50.9%
2010 8.9% -12.5%
2012 9.2% +3.3%
2013 9.7% +5.8%
2014 12.2% +25.6%
2015 11.2% -8.4%
2016 13.9% +23.8%
2017 11.4% -18.0%
2018 10.9% -4.6%
2019 10.4% -4.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.5% 6.7% 10.2% 2
2010s 10.9% 8.9% 13.9% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 28 Chile 11.1% compare
  2. 29 Malawi 11.1% compare
  3. 30 Georgia 10.8% compare
  4. 32 Peru 9.7% compare
  5. 33 Ecuador 9.5% compare
  6. 34 Panama 8.5% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Belarus was 10.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 13.9% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 6.7% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
Belarus ranks 31st out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group