Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private was 9.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Belarus stood at 9.8%.
That represents a change of down 5.2% on the previous year and down 7.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Belarus peaked at 14.8% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 8.0%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 34th of 36 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 8.0% | — |
| 2009 | 10.5% | +31.9% |
| 2010 | 9.8% | -7.0% |
| 2012 | 10.4% | +5.8% |
| 2013 | 11.4% | +9.9% |
| 2014 | 14.4% | +26.1% |
| 2015 | 12.7% | -11.6% |
| 2016 | 14.8% | +16.5% |
| 2017 | 11.2% | -24.8% |
| 2018 | 10.3% | -7.5% |
| 2019 | 9.8% | -5.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.3% | 8.0% | 10.5% | 2 |
| 2010s | 11.6% | 9.8% | 14.8% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 31 Ecuador 13.5% compare
- 32 Peru 12.5% compare
- 33 El Salvador 12.1% compare
- 35 Panama 8.9% compare
- 36 Burkina Faso 8.7% compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Belarus was 9.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 14.8% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.0% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 34th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group