Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 64.0% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
64.0%
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
4th
of 34 countries
All-time high
64.0%
in 2017
All-time low
50.1%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008–2019

02040602008201320192008: 50.12009: 52.32010: 54.32012: 52.92013: 56.82014: 59.52015: 59.62016: 63.22017: 642018: 63.52019: 64

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus is 64.0%, measured in 2019.

That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and up 22.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus peaked at 64.0% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 50.1%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 4th of 34 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 50.1%
2009 52.3% +4.4%
2010 54.3% +3.9%
2012 52.9% -2.7%
2013 56.8% +7.6%
2014 59.5% +4.6%
2015 59.6% +0.2%
2016 63.2% +6.1%
2017 64.0% +1.2%
2018 63.5% -0.9%
2019 64.0% +0.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 51.2% 50.1% 52.3% 2
2010s 59.8% 52.9% 64.0% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Thailand 106.8% compare
  2. 2 Poland 93.5% compare
  3. 3 Romania 84.1% compare
  4. 5 Kazakhstan 61.1% compare
  5. 6 South Africa 60.9% compare
  6. 7 Türkiye 55.4% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus was 64.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 64.0% in 2017.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 50.1% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 22.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group