Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 59.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
59.8%
Change on year
down 1.5%
World rank
6th
of 34 countries
All-time high
60.7%
in 2018
All-time low
44.8%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008–2019

02040602008201320192008: 44.82009: 47.52010: 49.92012: 53.42013: 52.92014: 55.62015: 54.92016: 59.62017: 57.12018: 60.72019: 59.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 59.8% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.5% on the previous year and up 25.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus peaked at 60.7% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 44.8%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 6th of 34 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 44.8%
2009 47.5% +6.0%
2010 49.9% +5.0%
2012 53.4% +7.1%
2013 52.9% -1.0%
2014 55.6% +5.1%
2015 54.9% -1.2%
2016 59.6% +8.6%
2017 57.1% -4.2%
2018 60.7% +6.3%
2019 59.8% -1.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 46.2% 44.8% 47.5% 2
2010s 56.0% 49.9% 60.7% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 3 Romania 91.9% compare
  2. 4 Kazakhstan 65.7% compare
  3. 5 South Africa 65.5% compare
  4. 7 Serbia 59.5% compare
  5. 8 Turkey 55.4% compare
  6. 9 Mongolia 52.2% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus was 59.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 60.7% in 2018.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 44.8% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Belarus ranks 6th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 25.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group