Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 84.1% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
84.1%
Change on year
up 12.1%
World rank
2nd
of 31 countries
All-time high
84.1%
in 2019
All-time low
64.8%
in 2012
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 722009: 72.12010: 682012: 64.82013: 762014: 76.92015: 80.52016: 83.12017: 81.82018: 75.12019: 84.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus stood at 84.1%. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 12.1% on the previous year and up 16.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus peaked at 84.1% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 64.8%, in 2012.

Belarus ranks 2nd of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 72.0%
2009 72.1% +0.1%
2010 68.0% -5.6%
2012 64.8% -4.8%
2013 76.0% +17.3%
2014 76.9% +1.2%
2015 80.5% +4.7%
2016 83.1% +3.3%
2017 81.8% -1.6%
2018 75.1% -8.2%
2019 84.1% +12.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 72.0% 72.0% 72.1% 2
2010s 76.7% 64.8% 84.1% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Thailand 100.2% compare
  2. 3 Romania 80.5% compare
  3. 4 Poland 71.1% compare
  4. 5 Brazil 63.4% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus was 84.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 84.1% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 64.8% in 2012.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Belarus ranks 2nd out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group