Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 62.9% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
62.9%
Change on year
up 39.2%
World rank
3rd
of 34 countries
All-time high
62.9%
in 2019
All-time low
45.2%
in 2017
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland, 2005–2019

02040602005201220192005: 59.7 preT2006: 58.1 preT2007: 55.2 preT2008: 53.5 preT2009: 54.7 preT2010: 54 preT2011: 54.4 preT2012: 55 preT2015: 57.6 preT2016: 56.2 preT2017: 45.2 preT2019: 62.9 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

Poland recorded 62.9% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 39.2% on the previous year and up 15.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland peaked at 62.9% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 45.2%, in 2017.

Poland ranks 3rd of 34 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT) in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year preT Change
2005 59.7%
2006 58.1% -2.7%
2007 55.2% -4.9%
2008 53.5% -3.1%
2009 54.7% +2.2%
2010 54.0% -1.2%
2011 54.4% +0.6%
2012 55.0% +1.1%
2015 57.6% +4.8%
2016 56.2% -2.4%
2017 45.2% -19.5%
2019 62.9% +39.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 56.3% 53.5% 59.7% 5
2010s 55.0% 45.2% 62.9% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 1 Thailand 78.4% compare
  2. 2 South Africa 74.6% compare
  3. 4 Romania 55.8% compare
  4. 5 Uruguay 51.3% compare
  5. 6 Kazakhstan 51.3% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland was 62.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 62.9% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 45.2% in 2017.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Poland ranks 3rd out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 15.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-pret/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-pret/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group