Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 8,324.8% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
8,324.8%
Change on year
up 77,777.9%
World rank
1st
of 36 countries
All-time high
8,324.8%
in 2019
All-time low
10.7%
in 2017
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, 2005–2019

02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k2005201220192005: 152006: 14.42007: 142008: 13.62009: 13.82010: 14.52011: 14.12012: 14.52015: 12.82016: 10.92017: 10.72019: 8.3k

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Poland recorded 8,324.8% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 77,777.9% on the previous year and up 60,010.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland peaked at 8,324.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 10.7%, in 2017.

That places Poland 1st out of 36 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 15.0%
2006 14.4% -4.2%
2007 14.0% -3.1%
2008 13.6% -2.7%
2009 13.8% +1.9%
2010 14.5% +4.7%
2011 14.1% -2.9%
2012 14.5% +3.4%
2015 12.8% -11.8%
2016 10.9% -14.8%
2017 10.7% -2.1%
2019 8,324.8% +77777.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 14.2% 13.6% 15.0% 5
2010s 1,200.3% 10.7% 8,324.8% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 2 Kosovo 67.0% compare
  2. 2 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 67.0% compare
  3. 4 Viet Nam 59.6% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland was 8,324.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 8,324.8% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 10.7% in 2017.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Poland ranks 1st out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 60,010.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group