Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 62.6% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
62.6%
Change on year
up 96.7%
World rank
4th
of 36 countries
All-time high
62.6%
in 2020
All-time low
13.8%
in 2006
Years of data
6
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

1020304050602006201320202006: 13.8 preT2010: 43 preT2012: 47.5 preT2014: 51.1 preT2018: 31.8 preT2020: 62.6 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Viet Nam is 62.6%, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 96.7% on the previous year and up 45.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Viet Nam peaked at 62.6% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 13.8%, in 2006.

That places Viet Nam 4th out of 36 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT) in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year preT Change
2006 13.8%
2010 43.0% +211.1%
2012 47.5% +10.4%
2014 51.1% +7.6%
2018 31.8% -37.7%
2020 62.6% +96.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 13.8% 13.8% 13.8% 1
2010s 43.3% 31.8% 51.1% 4
2020s 62.6% 62.6% 62.6% 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 1 Poland 8,072.1% compare
  2. 2 Kosovo 64.2% compare
  3. 2 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 64.2% compare
  4. 5 Republic of Moldova 60.2% compare
  5. 6 Kyrgyzstan 54.3% compare
  6. 7 Armenia 49.4% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Viet Nam?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Viet Nam was 62.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 62.6% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 13.8% in 2006.
How does Viet Nam rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Viet Nam ranks 4th out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is up 45.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-pret/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-pret/viet-nam/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group