Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 70.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
70.8%
Change on year
up 7.3%
World rank
4th
of 34 countries
All-time high
72.4%
in 2015
All-time low
54.1%
in 2012
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 55.22009: 54.82010: 61.62012: 54.12013: 662014: 64.32015: 72.42016: 70.22017: 65.12018: 66.12019: 70.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 70.8% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in 2019.

The figure is up 7.3% on the previous year and up 29.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus peaked at 72.4% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 54.1%, in 2012.

That places Belarus 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 55.2%
2009 54.8% -0.7%
2010 61.6% +12.3%
2012 54.1% -12.2%
2013 66.0% +22.1%
2014 64.3% -2.6%
2015 72.4% +12.6%
2016 70.2% -3.0%
2017 65.1% -7.3%
2018 66.1% +1.5%
2019 70.8% +7.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 55.0% 54.8% 55.2% 2
2010s 65.6% 54.1% 72.4% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Poland 114.5% compare
  2. 2 Thailand 111.5% compare
  3. 3 Romania 98.0% compare
  4. 5 South Africa 68.7% compare
  5. 6 Serbia 67.1% compare
  6. 7 Kazakhstan 64.5% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus was 70.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 72.4% in 2015.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 54.1% in 2012.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 29.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group