Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Ecuador

Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 27.8% in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
27.8%
Change on year
down 6.3%
World rank
28th
of 31 countries
All-time high
37.3%
in 2016
All-time low
20.4%
in 2014
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Ecuador, 2008–2022

0102030402008201520222008: 282010: 27.32011: 292012: 26.72014: 20.42015: 23.72016: 37.32017: 24.12018: 30.22019: 25.62020: 27.92021: 29.72022: 27.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Ecuador recorded 27.8% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in 2022.

The figure is down 6.3% on the previous year and up 4.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Ecuador peaked at 37.3% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 20.4%, in 2014.

That places Ecuador 28th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 28.0%
2010 27.3% -2.5%
2011 29.0% +6.3%
2012 26.7% -8.1%
2014 20.4% -23.5%
2015 23.7% +16.3%
2016 37.3% +57.3%
2017 24.1% -35.4%
2018 30.2% +25.4%
2019 25.6% -15.4%
2020 27.9% +9.0%
2021 29.7% +6.6%
2022 27.8% -6.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 1
2010s 27.1% 20.4% 37.3% 9
2020s 28.5% 27.8% 29.7% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 25 Armenia 33.6% compare
  2. 26 Côte d'Ivoire 33.6% compare
  3. 27 Mexico 28.0% compare
  4. 29 Kosovo 26.5% compare
  5. 29 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 26.5% compare
  6. 31 El Salvador 15.7% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Ecuador?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Ecuador was 27.8% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 37.3% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 20.4% in 2014.
How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Ecuador ranks 28th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/ecuador/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group