Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 10.1% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
10.1%
Change on year
up 19.9%
World rank
33rd
of 36 countries
All-time high
12.5%
in 2014
All-time low
7.6%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 7.62009: 10.42010: 10.12012: 11.12013: 12.12014: 12.52015: 10.72016: 11.12017: 10.52018: 8.52019: 10.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus stood at 10.1%.

That represents a change of up 19.9% on the previous year and down 2.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus peaked at 12.5% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 7.6%, in 2008.

That places Belarus 33rd out of 36 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 7.6%
2009 10.4% +36.4%
2010 10.1% -2.4%
2012 11.1% +9.6%
2013 12.1% +9.3%
2014 12.5% +3.0%
2015 10.7% -14.4%
2016 11.1% +3.7%
2017 10.5% -5.3%
2018 8.5% -19.6%
2019 10.1% +19.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 9.0% 7.6% 10.4% 2
2010s 10.8% 8.5% 12.5% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 30 Chile 14.6% compare
  2. 31 Côte d'Ivoire 14.0% compare
  3. 32 Panama 11.4% compare
  4. 34 Ecuador 9.8% compare
  5. 35 Burkina Faso 7.8% compare
  6. 36 Malawi 7.2% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus was 10.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 12.5% in 2014.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 7.6% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Belarus ranks 33rd out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group