Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 43.4% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
43.4%
World rank
8th
of 35 countries
All-time high
78.4%
in 2006
All-time low
36.3%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

0204060802006201120172006: 78.42011: 61.72012: 36.32013: 452017: 43.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) recorded 43.4% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2017.

That represents a change of down 44.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 78.4% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 36.3%, in 2012.

That places Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 8th out of 35 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 78.4%
2011 61.7% -21.3%
2012 36.3% -41.2%
2013 45.0% +24.0%
2017 43.4% -3.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 78.4% 78.4% 78.4% 1
2010s 46.6% 36.3% 61.7% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 5 Armenia 52.7% compare
  2. 6 South Africa 51.0% compare
  3. 7 Thailand 46.6% compare
  4. 8 Kosovo 43.4% compare
  5. 10 Serbia 39.9% compare
  6. 11 Sri Lanka 39.7% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 43.4% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 78.4% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 36.3% in 2012.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 8th out of 35 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is down 44.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group