Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 9.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
9.8%
Change on year
up 14.0%
World rank
32nd
of 35 countries
All-time high
11.1%
in 2013
All-time low
7.1%
in 2010
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019

02.557.5102008201320192008: 7.62009: 10.42010: 7.12012: 92013: 11.12014: 10.92015: 9.62016: 9.12017: 9.22018: 8.62019: 9.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 9.8% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2019.

The figure is up 14.0% on the previous year and down 6.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus peaked at 11.1% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 7.1%, in 2010.

That places Belarus 32nd out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 7.6%
2009 10.4% +37.6%
2010 7.1% -31.7%
2012 9.0% +25.8%
2013 11.1% +23.7%
2014 10.9% -1.9%
2015 9.6% -12.2%
2016 9.1% -5.3%
2017 9.2% +1.8%
2018 8.6% -7.0%
2019 9.8% +14.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 9.0% 7.6% 10.4% 2
2010s 9.4% 7.1% 11.1% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 29 Türkiye 13.6% compare
  2. 30 Chile 13.1% compare
  3. 31 Côte d'Ivoire 10.6% compare
  4. 33 Ecuador 9.8% compare
  5. 34 Burkina Faso 7.6% compare
  6. 35 Malawi 7.2% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus was 9.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 11.1% in 2013.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 7.1% in 2010.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Belarus ranks 32nd out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group