Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 86.6% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
86.6%
Change on year
up 9.2%
World rank
4th
of 34 countries
All-time high
86.6%
in 2019
All-time low
66.5%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 66.52009: 69.22010: 67.52012: 72.22013: 78.52014: 82.92015: 82.42016: 85.32017: 84.92018: 79.32019: 86.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus is 86.6%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

That represents a change of up 9.2% on the previous year and up 25.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus peaked at 86.6% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 66.5%, in 2008.

That places Belarus 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 66.5%
2009 69.2% +4.0%
2010 67.5% -2.4%
2012 72.2% +6.9%
2013 78.5% +8.7%
2014 82.9% +5.6%
2015 82.4% -0.6%
2016 85.3% +3.5%
2017 84.9% -0.5%
2018 79.3% -6.5%
2019 86.6% +9.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 67.8% 66.5% 69.2% 2
2010s 80.0% 67.5% 86.6% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Thailand 113.5% compare
  2. 2 Romania 98.8% compare
  3. 3 Poland 95.8% compare
  4. 5 Côte d'Ivoire 75.4% compare
  5. 6 Serbia 69.6% compare
  6. 7 South Africa 64.7% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus was 86.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 86.6% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 66.5% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 25.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group