Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 56.9% in 2021. ▲ Rising

Latest (2021)
56.9%
Change on year
down 10.3%
World rank
10th
of 34 countries
All-time high
63.4%
in 2020
All-time low
4.9%
in 2014
Years of data
9
2007–2021

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021

02040602007201420212007: 14.72010: 28.82014: 4.92015: 55.12017: 57.82018: 59.22019: 60.82020: 63.42021: 56.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Kazakhstan recorded 56.9% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in 2021.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.3% on the previous year and up 97.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Kazakhstan peaked at 63.4% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 4.9%, in 2014.

That places Kazakhstan 10th out of 34 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kazakhstan, 2007 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2007 14.7%
2010 28.8% +95.5%
2014 4.9% -83.0%
2015 55.1% +1025.3%
2017 57.8% +4.9%
2018 59.2% +2.5%
2019 60.8% +2.6%
2020 63.4% +4.3%
2021 56.9% -10.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 14.7% 14.7% 14.7% 1
2010s 44.4% 4.9% 60.8% 6
2020s 60.1% 56.9% 63.4% 2

Countries ranked near Kazakhstan

  1. 7 Türkiye 63.0% compare
  2. 8 South Africa 62.4% compare
  3. 9 Ukraine 59.2% compare
  4. 11 Colombia 54.2% compare
  5. 12 Sri Lanka 52.4% compare
  6. 13 Brazil 50.6% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Kazakhstan

All data for Kazakhstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Kazakhstan?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Kazakhstan was 56.9% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Kazakhstan?
The highest recorded value was 63.4% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Kazakhstan?
The lowest recorded value was 4.9% in 2014.
How does Kazakhstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Kazakhstan ranks 10th out of 34 countries with data for 2021.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 97.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/kazakhstan/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group