Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 9,871.4% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
9,871.4%
Change on year
up 64,615.8%
World rank
1st
of 36 countries
All-time high
9,871.4%
in 2019
All-time low
14.0%
in 2016
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, 2005–2019

02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k2005201220192005: 17.82006: 19.22007: 15.92008: 15.82009: 172010: 162011: 162012: 16.12015: 16.42016: 142017: 15.32019: 9.9k

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland stood at 9,871.4%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 64,615.8% on the previous year and up 57,930.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland peaked at 9,871.4% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 14.0%, in 2016.

Poland ranks 1st of 36 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 17.8%
2006 19.2% +8.0%
2007 15.9% -17.6%
2008 15.8% -0.5%
2009 17.0% +7.8%
2010 16.0% -5.9%
2011 16.0% -0.0%
2012 16.1% +0.3%
2015 16.4% +2.2%
2016 14.0% -14.5%
2017 15.3% +8.8%
2019 9,871.4% +64615.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 17.1% 15.8% 19.2% 5
2010s 1,423.6% 14.0% 9,871.4% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 2 Viet Nam 78.7% compare
  2. 3 Armenia 66.5% compare
  3. 4 Kyrgyzstan 57.1% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland was 9,871.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 9,871.4% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 14.0% in 2016.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Poland ranks 1st out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 57,930.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group