Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 7,653.3% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
7,653.3%
Change on year
up 66,130.2%
World rank
1st
of 35 countries
All-time high
7,653.3%
in 2019
All-time low
10.9%
in 2016
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, 2005–2019

02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k2005201220192005: 13.62006: 12.12007: 13.72008: 11.42009: 12.32010: 11.12011: 11.32012: 13.62015: 11.72016: 10.92017: 11.62019: 7.7k

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Poland recorded 7,653.3% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 66,130.2% on the previous year and up 61,894.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland peaked at 7,653.3% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 10.9%, in 2016.

That places Poland 1st out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 13.6%
2006 12.1% -11.2%
2007 13.7% +13.9%
2008 11.4% -17.3%
2009 12.3% +8.6%
2010 11.1% -10.4%
2011 11.3% +2.3%
2012 13.6% +20.0%
2015 11.7% -13.8%
2016 10.9% -7.0%
2017 11.6% +6.2%
2019 7,653.3% +66130.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 12.6% 11.4% 13.7% 5
2010s 1,103.3% 10.9% 7,653.3% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 2 Viet Nam 86.2% compare
  2. 3 Republic of Moldova 67.7% compare
  3. 4 Armenia 63.4% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Poland was 7,653.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 7,653.3% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 10.9% in 2016.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Poland ranks 1st out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 61,894.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group