Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras

Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 27.4% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
27.4%
Change on year
down 13.2%
World rank
15th
of 35 countries
All-time high
35.0%
in 2008
All-time low
27.0%
in 2009
Years of data
10
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras, 2008–2019

0102030402008201320192008: 352009: 272010: 28.22011: 31.22013: 31.42015: 27.42016: 33.22017: 29.42018: 31.62019: 27.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Honduras recorded 27.4% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2019.

That represents a change of down 13.2% on the previous year and up 1.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Honduras peaked at 35.0% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 27.0%, in 2009.

That places Honduras 15th out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Honduras, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 35.0%
2009 27.0% -22.9%
2010 28.2% +4.4%
2011 31.2% +10.7%
2013 31.4% +0.9%
2015 27.4% -12.9%
2016 33.2% +21.1%
2017 29.4% -11.2%
2018 31.6% +7.3%
2019 27.4% -13.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 31.0% 27.0% 35.0% 2
2010s 30.0% 27.4% 33.2% 8

Countries ranked near Honduras

  1. 12 Romania 35.9% compare
  2. 13 Dominican Republic 29.8% compare
  3. 14 Costa Rica 28.9% compare
  4. 16 Pakistan 26.0% compare
  5. 17 Paraguay 25.7% compare
  6. 18 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 23.6% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Honduras

All data for Honduras →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Honduras?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Honduras was 27.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Honduras?
The highest recorded value was 35.0% in 2008.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Honduras?
The lowest recorded value was 27.0% in 2009.
How does Honduras rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Honduras ranks 15th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Honduras?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Honduras data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/honduras/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group