Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 51.7% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
51.7%
World rank
6th
of 36 countries
All-time high
74.7%
in 2006
All-time low
44.4%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

0204060802006201120172006: 74.7 preT2011: 57.2 preT2012: 44.4 preT2013: 48 preT2017: 51.7 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) recorded 51.7% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2017.

The figure is down 30.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 74.7% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 44.4%, in 2012.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 6th of 36 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year preT Change
2006 74.7%
2011 57.2% -23.4%
2012 44.4% -22.5%
2013 48.0% +8.3%
2017 51.7% +7.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 74.7% 74.7% 74.7% 1
2010s 50.3% 44.4% 57.2% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 3 Armenia 65.1% compare
  2. 4 Republic of Moldova 59.1% compare
  3. 5 Kyrgyzstan 56.8% compare
  4. 6 Kosovo 51.7% compare
  5. 8 South Africa 49.5% compare
  6. 9 Thailand 43.9% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 51.7% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 74.7% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 44.4% in 2012.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is down 30.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-pret/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-pret/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group