Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 11.9% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus is 11.9%, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of up 9.9% on the previous year and down 7.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus peaked at 16.6% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 7.6%, in 2008.
That places Belarus 34th out of 36 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 7.6% | — |
| 2009 | 12.9% | +70.5% |
| 2010 | 10.3% | -20.4% |
| 2012 | 12.4% | +20.2% |
| 2013 | 14.5% | +17.3% |
| 2014 | 16.6% | +14.1% |
| 2015 | 11.7% | -29.2% |
| 2016 | 12.6% | +7.1% |
| 2017 | 11.4% | -9.6% |
| 2018 | 10.8% | -4.5% |
| 2019 | 11.9% | +9.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.3% | 7.6% | 12.9% | 2 |
| 2010s | 12.5% | 10.3% | 16.6% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 31 Ecuador 13.9% compare
- 32 Panama 13.8% compare
- 33 Côte d'Ivoire 12.3% compare
- 35 Malawi 8.7% compare
- 36 Burkina Faso 8.4% compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus was 11.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 16.6% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.6% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 34th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group