Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory was 83.7% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
83.7%
Change on year
up 3.5%
World rank
4th
of 34 countries
All-time high
92.7%
in 2013
All-time low
75.1%
in 2017
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060801002008201320192008: 76.52009: 79.62010: 75.12012: 78.82013: 92.72014: 87.12015: 84.82016: 84.22017: 75.12018: 80.92019: 83.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus stood at 83.7%.

That represents a change of up 3.5% on the previous year and up 5.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus peaked at 92.7% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 75.1%, in 2017.

That places Belarus 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 76.5%
2009 79.6% +4.1%
2010 75.1% -5.5%
2012 78.8% +4.8%
2013 92.7% +17.8%
2014 87.1% -6.1%
2015 84.8% -2.7%
2016 84.2% -0.7%
2017 75.1% -10.8%
2018 80.9% +7.6%
2019 83.7% +3.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 78.0% 76.5% 79.6% 2
2010s 82.5% 75.1% 92.7% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Thailand 142.0% compare
  2. 2 Romania 100.1% compare
  3. 3 Poland 97.8% compare
  4. 5 Serbia 82.3% compare
  5. 6 Ukraine 65.8% compare
  6. 7 Sri Lanka 65.0% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus was 83.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 92.7% in 2013.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 75.1% in 2017.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-contributory-pensions/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-contributory-pensions/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 345 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group