Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia

Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 47.7% in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
47.7%
Change on year
up 50.7%
World rank
6th
of 36 countries
All-time high
53.7%
in 2010
All-time low
20.4%
in 2007
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia, 2007–2022

02040602007201420222007: 20.42010: 53.72013: 38.92015: 35.92018: 48.12019: 47.92021: 31.72022: 47.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Serbia is 47.7%, measured in 2022.

The figure is up 50.7% on the previous year and up 22.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Serbia peaked at 53.7% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 20.4%, in 2007.

That places Serbia 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2007 20.4%
2010 53.7% +163.3%
2013 38.9% -27.5%
2015 35.9% -7.9%
2018 48.1% +34.1%
2019 47.9% -0.4%
2021 31.7% -33.9%
2022 47.7% +50.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 20.4% 20.4% 20.4% 1
2010s 44.9% 35.9% 53.7% 5
2020s 39.7% 31.7% 47.7% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 3 South Africa 60.0% compare
  2. 4 Republic of Moldova 56.1% compare
  3. 5 Kyrgyzstan 54.3% compare
  4. 7 Thailand 47.0% compare
  5. 8 Romania 45.7% compare
  6. 9 Viet Nam 45.0% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Serbia?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Serbia was 47.7% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 53.7% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 20.4% in 2007.
How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Serbia ranks 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is up 22.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/serbia/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group