Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mexico

Mexico: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 20.3% in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
20.3%
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
28th
of 36 countries
All-time high
65.3%
in 2008
All-time low
18.6%
in 2016
Years of data
8
2008–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mexico, 2008–2022

2030405060702008201520222008: 65.32010: 65.22012: 53.52014: 25.62016: 18.62018: 18.82020: 20.32022: 20.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mexico is 20.3%, measured in 2022.

That represents a change of down 62.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mexico peaked at 65.3% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 18.6%, in 2016.

That places Mexico 28th out of 36 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mexico, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Mexico, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 65.3%
2010 65.2% -0.2%
2012 53.5% -17.9%
2014 25.6% -52.2%
2016 18.6% -27.1%
2018 18.8% +1.1%
2020 20.3% +7.9%
2022 20.3% +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 65.3% 65.3% 65.3% 1
2010s 36.4% 18.6% 65.2% 5
2020s 20.3% 20.3% 20.3% 2

Countries ranked near Mexico

  1. 25 El Salvador 23.5% compare
  2. 26 Kazakhstan 22.3% compare
  3. 27 Uruguay 20.9% compare
  4. 29 Türkiye 17.9% compare
  5. 30 Panama 17.3% compare
  6. 31 Ecuador 16.5% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Mexico

All data for Mexico →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mexico?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mexico was 20.3% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Mexico?
The highest recorded value was 65.3% in 2008.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Mexico?
The lowest recorded value was 18.6% in 2016.
How does Mexico rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Mexico ranks 28th out of 36 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Mexico?
Over the last ten years it is down 62.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Mexico data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mexico. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/mexico/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mexico</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group