Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 32.0% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
32.0%
Change on year
up 55.5%
World rank
16th
of 36 countries
All-time high
32.0%
in 2020
All-time low
15.5%
in 2012
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia, 2007–2020

01020302007201320202007: 18.8 preT2009: 17 preT2010: 16 preT2011: 18.7 preT2012: 15.5 preT2014: 20.3 preT2016: 21.5 preT2018: 20.6 preT2020: 32 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mongolia stood at 32.0%. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 55.5% on the previous year and up 100.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mongolia peaked at 32.0% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 15.5%, in 2012.

Mongolia ranks 16th of 36 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT) in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year preT Change
2007 18.8%
2009 17.0% -9.3%
2010 16.0% -6.3%
2011 18.7% +17.0%
2012 15.5% -16.9%
2014 20.3% +30.5%
2016 21.5% +6.2%
2018 20.6% -4.4%
2020 32.0% +55.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 17.9% 17.0% 18.8% 2
2010s 18.8% 15.5% 21.5% 6
2020s 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 13 Honduras 35.5% compare
  2. 14 Sri Lanka 34.3% compare
  3. 15 Costa Rica 32.8% compare
  4. 17 Paraguay 28.8% compare
  5. 18 Colombia 28.8% compare
  6. 19 Pakistan 25.8% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mongolia was 32.0% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 32.0% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 15.5% in 2012.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Mongolia ranks 16th out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 100.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-pret/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-pret/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group