28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks, per unit of GDP in Cuba
Cuba: 28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks, per unit of GDP was 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP in 2020. ▼ Falling
28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks, per unit of GDP in Cuba, 1995–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 28_cross-border dep. with bis banks, nonbanks, per unit of gdp in Cuba is 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2020. That is the lowest value across all 26 years on record.
That represents a change of down 41.7% on the previous year and down 56.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 28_cross-border dep. with bis banks, nonbanks, per unit of gdp in Cuba peaked at 0.0078 units per US$ of GDP in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP, in 2020.
Cuba ranks 201st of 204 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks, per unit of GDP in Cuba, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0.0029 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0.0038 units per US$ of GDP | +31.2% |
| 1997 | 0.0042 units per US$ of GDP | +8.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0064 units per US$ of GDP | +53.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0063 units per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0062 units per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0075 units per US$ of GDP | +20.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0076 units per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0076 units per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 0.0078 units per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0068 units per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0063 units per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0037 units per US$ of GDP | -40.8% |
| 2008 | 0.004 units per US$ of GDP | +8.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0037 units per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0037 units per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2011 | 0.0042 units per US$ of GDP | +13.7% |
| 2012 | 0.0036 units per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0039 units per US$ of GDP | +8.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0038 units per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0032 units per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0032 units per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0055 units per US$ of GDP | +71.1% |
| 2018 | 0.0038 units per US$ of GDP | -30.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0028 units per US$ of GDP | -27.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP | -41.7% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0299 units per US$ of GDP, 5% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0794 units per US$ of GDP, 2% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0047 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0029 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0064 units per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0.0061 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0037 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0078 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0038 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0028 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0055 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 28_cross-border dep. with bis banks, nonbanks, per unit of gdp in Cuba?
- 28_cross-border dep. with bis banks, nonbanks, per unit of gdp in Cuba was 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 28_cross-border dep. with bis banks, nonbanks, per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0078 units per US$ of GDP in 2004.
- What is the lowest 28_cross-border dep. with bis banks, nonbanks, per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP in 2020.
- How does Cuba rank for 28_cross-border dep. with bis banks, nonbanks, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 201st out of 204 countries with data for 2020.
- Is 28_cross-border dep. with bis banks, nonbanks, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 56.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- 28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks BIS
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks, nonbanks divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.