08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre in Latvia
Latvia: 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0 units per square kilometre
World rank
137th
of 214 countries
All-time high
8,887 units per square kilometre
in 2014
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Years of data
28
1996–2023
08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre in Latvia, 1996–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre in Latvia stood at 0 units per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 28 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre in Latvia peaked at 8,887 units per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 2022.
Latvia ranks 137th of 214 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre in Latvia, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 3,359 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1997 | 3,134 units per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1998 | 3,198 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1999 | 3,857 units per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2000 | 3,778 units per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2001 | 3,789 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 3,895 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2003 | 4,242 units per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2004 | 2,940 units per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 2005 | 2,910 units per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2006 | 1,760 units per square kilometre | -39.5% |
| 2007 | 1,589 units per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 2008 | 1,425 units per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2009 | 916.52 units per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 2010 | 4,882 units per square kilometre | +432.7% |
| 2011 | 7,144 units per square kilometre | +46.3% |
| 2012 | 8,732 units per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2013 | 8,296 units per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2014 | 8,887 units per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2015 | 6,567 units per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 2016 | 5,956 units per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2017 | 4,120 units per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 2018 | 3,169 units per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 2019 | 1,443 units per square kilometre | -54.5% |
| 2020 | 351.9 units per square kilometre | -75.6% |
| 2021 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2022 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2023 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | +432.7% | 916.52 units per square kilometre | 4,882 units per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,387 units per square kilometre | 3,134 units per square kilometre | 3,857 units per square kilometre | 4 |
| 2000s | 2,724 units per square kilometre | 916.52 units per square kilometre | 4,242 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5,920 units per square kilometre | 1,443 units per square kilometre | 8,887 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 87.98 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 351.9 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 134 Syria 76.52 units per square kilometre compare
- 135 Haiti 10.5 units per square kilometre compare
- 136 Russia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Aruba 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Andorra 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 United Arab Emirates 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 American Samoa 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Antigua and Barbuda 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Australia 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Austria 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Belgium 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Bahrain 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Bermuda 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Brunei 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Canada 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Switzerland 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Cuba 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Curacao 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Cayman Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Czechia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Germany 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Denmark 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Spain 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Estonia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Finland 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 France 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Faroe Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 United Kingdom 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Gibraltar 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Greece 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Greenland 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Guam 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Hong Kong 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Hungary 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Isle of Man 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Ireland 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Iceland 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Italy 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Japan 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Kuwait 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Libya 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Liechtenstein 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Lithuania 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Luxembourg 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Macao 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Saint Martin (French part) 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Monaco 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Malta 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Northern Mariana Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 New Caledonia 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Netherlands 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Norway 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Nauru 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 New Zealand 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Palau 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Puerto Rico 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 North Korea 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Portugal 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 French Polynesia 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Qatar 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Saudi Arabia 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 San Marino 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Serbia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 South Sudan 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Slovakia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Slovenia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Sweden 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 East Timor 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 Tuvalu 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 United States 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 British Virgin Islands 0 units per square kilometre
- 137 United States Virgin Islands 0 units per square kilometre
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre in Latvia?
- 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre in Latvia was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 8,887 units per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2022.
- How does Latvia rank for 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre?
- Latvia ranks 137th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Is 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 28 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
08_Multilateral loans, other institutions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
08_Multilateral loans, other institutions ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, Inter-American Development, World Bank
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
08_Multilateral loans, other institutions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.