Statizoid

07_Multilateral loans, IMF in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF was 0 in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
0
World rank
92nd
of 186 countries
All-time high
483.75 million
in 1995
All-time low
0
in 1991
Years of data
36
1990–2025

07_Multilateral loans, IMF in Zimbabwe, 1990–2025

0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M1990200720251990: 15.9M1991: 01992: 97.7M1993: 219.7M1994: 363.7M1995: 483.8M1996: 453.0M1997: 409.9M1998: 362.7M1999: 371.5M2000: 334.4M2001: 264.1M2002: 266.7M2003: 297.1M2004: 315.0M2005: 309.7M2006: 119.7M2007: 130.3M2008: 143.1M2009: 133.4M2010: 135.6M2011: 138.2M2012: 135.5M2013: 123.4M2014: 125.5M2015: 110.4M2016: 111.0M2017: 02018: 02019: 02020: 02021: 02022: 02023: 02024: 02025: 0

Source: IMF.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 07_multilateral loans, imf in Zimbabwe is 0, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 07_multilateral loans, imf in Zimbabwe peaked at 483.75 million in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1991.

Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 277.78 million 0 483.75 million 10
2000s 231.36 million 119.73 million 334.38 million 10
2010s 87.96 million 0 138.19 million 10
2020s 0 0 0 6

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 89 Solomon Islands 11.61 million compare
  2. 90 Montenegro 10.05 million compare
  3. 91 Vanuatu 1.13 million compare
  4. 92 Algeria 0 compare
  5. 92 Antigua and Barbuda 0 compare
  6. 92 Australia 0 compare
  7. 92 Austria 0 compare
  8. 92 Azerbaijan 0 compare
  9. 92 Bahrain 0 compare
  10. 92 Belarus 0 compare
  11. 92 Belgium 0 compare
  12. 92 Belize 0 compare
  13. 92 Bhutan 0 compare
  14. 92 Bolivia 0 compare
  15. 92 Botswana 0 compare
  16. 92 Brazil 0 compare
  17. 92 Brunei 0 compare
  18. 92 Bulgaria 0 compare
  19. 92 Cambodia 0 compare
  20. 92 Canada 0 compare
  21. 92 Chile 0 compare
  22. 92 China 0 compare
  23. 92 Croatia 0 compare
  24. 92 Cyprus 0 compare
  25. 92 Czechia 0 compare
  26. 92 Denmark 0 compare
  27. 92 Eritrea 0 compare
  28. 92 Estonia 0 compare
  29. 92 Fiji 0 compare
  30. 92 Finland 0 compare
  31. 92 France 0 compare
  32. 92 Germany 0 compare
  33. 92 Greece 0 compare
  34. 92 Guatemala 0 compare
  35. 92 Guyana 0 compare
  36. 92 Hong Kong 0 compare
  37. 92 Hungary 0 compare
  38. 92 Iceland 0 compare
  39. 92 India 0 compare
  40. 92 Indonesia 0 compare
  41. 92 Iran 0 compare
  42. 92 Iraq 0 compare
  43. 92 Ireland 0 compare
  44. 92 Israel 0 compare
  45. 92 Italy 0 compare
  46. 92 Japan 0 compare
  47. 92 Kazakhstan 0 compare
  48. 92 Kiribati 0 compare
  49. 92 South Korea 0 compare
  50. 92 Kuwait 0 compare
  51. 92 Laos 0 compare
  52. 92 Latvia 0 compare
  53. 92 Lebanon 0 compare
  54. 92 Libya 0 compare
  55. 92 Lithuania 0 compare
  56. 92 Luxembourg 0 compare
  57. 92 Malaysia 0 compare
  58. 92 Malta 0 compare
  59. 92 Marshall Islands 0 compare
  60. 92 Mauritius 0 compare
  61. 92 Mexico 0 compare
  62. 92 Micronesia (country) 0 compare
  63. 92 Netherlands 0 compare
  64. 92 New Zealand 0 compare
  65. 92 Norway 0 compare
  66. 92 Oman 0 compare
  67. 92 Palau 0 compare
  68. 92 Paraguay 0 compare
  69. 92 Peru 0 compare
  70. 92 Philippines 0 compare
  71. 92 Poland 0 compare
  72. 92 Portugal 0 compare
  73. 92 Qatar 0 compare
  74. 92 Romania 0 compare
  75. 92 Russia 0 compare
  76. 92 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 compare
  77. 92 San Marino 0 compare
  78. 92 Saudi Arabia 0 compare
  79. 92 Singapore 0 compare
  80. 92 Slovakia 0 compare
  81. 92 Slovenia 0 compare
  82. 92 Spain 0 compare
  83. 92 Sweden 0 compare
  84. 92 Switzerland 0 compare
  85. 92 Syria 0 compare
  86. 92 Thailand 0 compare
  87. 92 East Timor 0 compare
  88. 92 Trinidad and Tobago 0 compare
  89. 92 Turkey 0 compare
  90. 92 Turkmenistan 0 compare
  91. 92 United Arab Emirates 0 compare
  92. 92 United Kingdom 0 compare
  93. 92 United States 0 compare
  94. 92 Uruguay 0 compare
  95. 92 Venezuela 0 compare
  96. 92 Vietnam 0 compare
  97. 92 Yemen 0 compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is 07_multilateral loans, imf in Zimbabwe?
07_multilateral loans, imf in Zimbabwe was 0 in 2025, according to IMF.
What is the highest 07_multilateral loans, imf recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 483.75 million in 1995.
What is the lowest 07_multilateral loans, imf recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1991.
How does Zimbabwe rank for 07_multilateral loans, imf?
Zimbabwe ranks 92nd out of 186 countries with data for 2025.
Is 07_multilateral loans, imf rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from IMF, published as part of 07_Multilateral loans, IMF. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
07_Multilateral loans, IMF
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 6,706 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The data cover total outstanding loans and other liabilities to the IMF as at the end of the reference period. Outstanding IMF credit and loans outstanding—representing the sum of (1) the use of IMF credit within the General Resources Account, (2) outstanding loans under the Structural Adjustment Facility (SAF), the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) and the Trust Fund, and (3) arrears of interest (if applicable). The data are sourced from IMF records. Data on total IMF credit and loans are also disseminated in the IMF’s statistical publication, International Financial Statistics.