Chile vs Iceland: Working-age population, aged 15-64, rural
Chile
0.6%
in 2017
Iceland
0.6%
in 2015
Chile rank
30th
Iceland rank
31st
Working-age population, aged 15-64, rural over time
- Chile
- Iceland
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.6% against 0.6% in Iceland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Iceland ahead.
Chile ranks 30th and Iceland ranks 31st of 96 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.0% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher working-age population, aged 15-64, rural, Chile or Iceland?
- Chile, at 0.6% against 0.6% in Iceland as of 2017.
- What is the difference in working-age population, aged 15-64, rural between Chile and Iceland?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
- How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for working-age population, aged 15-64, rural?
- Chile ranks 30th and Iceland ranks 31st of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Working-age population, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.