Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e

Jordan
2,075
in 2100
Lao People's Democratic Republic
1,940
in 2100
Jordan rank
85th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
86th

Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e over time

  • Jordan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
5001.0k1.5k2.0k201020552100

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 2,075 against 1,940 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 135.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 85th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 86th of 166 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 602.47 357.29 245.18 Jordan
2020s 933.38 522.68 410.7 Jordan
2030s 1,276 701.09 574.98 Jordan
2040s 1,610 915.4 694.2 Jordan
2050s 1,884 1,136 748.17 Jordan
2060s 2,069 1,356 712.39 Jordan
2070s 2,176 1,558 618.27 Jordan
2080s 2,200 1,721 478.36 Jordan
2090s 2,145 1,857 288.17 Jordan
2100s 2,075 1,940 135.53 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e, Jordan or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Jordan, at 2,075 against 1,940 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2100.
What is the difference in wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e between Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
135, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
19 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2100.
How do Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e?
Jordan ranks 85th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 86th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/, published as Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e. Statizoid, drawing on Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wittgenstein-projection-population-in-thousands-by-highest-level-of-educational-8/jordan/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wittgenstein-projection-population-in-thousands-by-highest-level-of-educational-8/jordan/lao-pdr/">Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male
Source
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
167 places, 3,173 data points, 2010–2100
Last refreshed

Total population in thousands that has completed upper secondary or incomplete post-secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/