Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e

Jordan
809.76
in 2100
Lao People's Democratic Republic
970.35
in 2100
Jordan rank
73rd
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
70th

Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e over time

  • Jordan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
05001.0k1.5k201020552100

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 970.35 against 809.76 in Jordan, a difference of 160.59.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 73rd and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 70th of 166 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 4 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 937.82 829.67 108.14 Jordan
2020s 1,227 1,047 180.23 Jordan
2030s 1,414 1,299 115.44 Jordan
2040s 1,541 1,491 50.49 Jordan
2050s 1,552 1,579 27.44 Lao People's Democratic Republic
2060s 1,471 1,565 93.96 Lao People's Democratic Republic
2070s 1,324 1,466 141.96 Lao People's Democratic Republic
2080s 1,133 1,301 168.39 Lao People's Democratic Republic
2090s 937.67 1,113 175.17 Lao People's Democratic Republic
2100s 809.76 970.35 160.59 Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e, Jordan or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 970.35 against 809.76 in Jordan as of 2100.
What is the difference in wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e between Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
160.59, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
19 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2100.
How do Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e?
Jordan ranks 73rd and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 70th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/, published as Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e. Statizoid, drawing on Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wittgenstein-projection-population-in-thousands-by-highest-level-of-educational-6/jordan/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wittgenstein-projection-population-in-thousands-by-highest-level-of-educational-6/jordan/lao-pdr/">Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total
Source
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
167 places, 3,173 data points, 2010–2100
Last refreshed

Total population in thousands that has completed lower secondary or incomplete upper secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/