Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Nepal: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e

Lao People's Democratic Republic
28.33
in 2100
Nepal
31.19
in 2100
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
48th
Nepal rank
46th

Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Nepal
0200400600201020552100

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 31.19 against 28.33 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 2.86.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 48th and Nepal ranks 46th of 166 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Nepal Difference Ahead
2010s 368.64 559.77 191.13 Nepal
2020s 385.79 559.25 173.46 Nepal
2030s 361.72 521.47 159.75 Nepal
2040s 318.71 455.79 137.08 Nepal
2050s 258.19 369.07 110.88 Nepal
2060s 189.33 269.29 79.96 Nepal
2070s 125.67 174.89 49.22 Nepal
2080s 76.29 101.71 25.42 Nepal
2090s 43.94 53.56 9.62 Nepal
2100s 28.33 31.19 2.86 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Nepal?
Nepal, at 31.19 against 28.33 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2100.
What is the difference in wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Nepal?
2.86, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Nepal?
19 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2100.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Nepal rank globally for wittgenstein projection: population in thousands by highest level of e?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 48th and Nepal ranks 46th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/, published as Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Nepal: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e. Statizoid, drawing on Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wittgenstein-projection-population-in-thousands-by-highest-level-of-educational-17/lao-pdr/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wittgenstein-projection-population-in-thousands-by-highest-level-of-educational-17/lao-pdr/nepal/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Nepal: Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of e</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male
Source
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
167 places, 3,173 data points, 2010–2100
Last refreshed

Total population in thousands that has pre-primary education or incomplete primary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/