Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest

Jordan
320.99
in 2100
Lao People's Democratic Republic
337.81
in 2100
Jordan rank
61st
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
58th

Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest over time

  • Jordan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
100150200250300350201020552100

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 337.81 against 320.99 in Jordan, a difference of 16.82.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 61st and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 58th of 166 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 8 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 179.28 155.2 24.08 Jordan
2020s 237.98 207.55 30.43 Jordan
2030s 270.28 257.18 13.1 Jordan
2040s 317 300.68 16.32 Jordan
2050s 337.87 316.39 21.47 Jordan
2060s 350.49 341.89 8.6 Jordan
2070s 358.94 354.84 4.1 Jordan
2080s 352.63 341.79 10.85 Jordan
2090s 334.59 341.31 6.72 Lao People's Democratic Republic
2100s 320.99 337.81 16.82 Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wittgenstein projection: population age 15-19 in thousands by highest, Jordan or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 337.81 against 320.99 in Jordan as of 2100.
What is the difference in wittgenstein projection: population age 15-19 in thousands by highest between Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
16.82, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
19 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2100.
How do Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for wittgenstein projection: population age 15-19 in thousands by highest?
Jordan ranks 61st and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 58th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/, published as Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest. Statizoid, drawing on Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wittgenstein-projection-population-age-15-19-in-thousands-by-highest-level-of-educational-9/jordan/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wittgenstein-projection-population-age-15-19-in-thousands-by-highest-level-of-educational-9/jordan/lao-pdr/">Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total
Source
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
167 places, 3,173 data points, 2010–2100
Last refreshed

Total population in thousands in the specified age group that has completed upper secondary or incomplete post-secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/